Section 3.6 Exercises
The following exercises are based on the material covered in Chapter 3.
Exercise 3.6.1.
Let \(\chi:\mathbb{N}\to \{0,1\}\) be a 2-colouring of positive integers and let \(k\in \mathbb{N}\text{.}\) Use van der Waerden's theorem to prove that there is a \(\chi\)-monochromatic \(k\)-term arithmetic progression with a common difference that is divisible by 3.
Let \(\chi:\mathbb{N}\to \{0,1\}\) be a 2-colouring of positive integers and let \(k\in \mathbb{N}\text{.}\) We define a new colouring \(\chi':\mathbb{N}\to \{0,1\}\) by
By van der Waerden's theorem there are \(a,d\in \mathbb{N}\) such that
By definition of the 2-colouring \(\chi'\) this implies that
Therefore the \(k\)-term monochromatic progression
is \(\chi\)-monochromatic. Note that the common difference of this arithmetic progression is \(3d\text{,}\) a number divisible by 3.
Exercise 3.6.2.
Consider the following 2-colouring of positive integers:
Check if the claim of van der Waerden's theorem holds: For any \(k\in \mathbb{N}\) find a monochromatic \(k\)-term arithmetic progression.
Show that there is no monochromatic arithmetic progression of infinite length.
-
Let \(k\in \mathbb{N}\) and let \(n\in \mathbb{N}\) be such that \(k\lt 2^n\text{.}\) By definition, the above colouring contains \(2^n\) consecutive integers coloured by 1. Therefore, there is positive integer \(a\) such that all terms of the \(k\)-term arithmetic progression
\begin{equation*} a,a+1,a+2,\ldots,a+(k-1) \end{equation*}are coloured by the colour 1.
-
Let
\begin{equation*} a,a+d,a+2d,\ldots,a+kd,\ldots \end{equation*}be an infinite arithmetic progression with the common difference \(d\) and let \(n\in \mathbb{N}\) be such that
\begin{equation*} d\lt 2^{n}\text{.} \end{equation*}Since \(d\lt 2^n\text{,}\) any interval of consecutive integers with at least \(2^n\) elements must contain a term from the infinite arithmetic progression with the common difference \(d\text{.}\)
On the other hand, by definition of the colouring we have
\begin{equation*} \underbrace{11\cdots 1}_{2^n}\underbrace{00\cdots 0}_{2^{n+1}} \mbox {\ or }\underbrace{00\cdots 0}_{2^n}\underbrace{11\cdots 1}_{2^{n+1}}\text{.} \end{equation*}Hence
\begin{equation*} a,a+d,a+2d,\ldots,a+kd,\ldots \end{equation*}is not monochromatic.
Exercise 3.6.3.
Prove that \(w(3;2,3,3)\leq18\text{.}\)
Let \(c\) be a 3-colouring of the interval \([1,18]\text{.}\) Say that the first colour is red, the second colour is blue, and the third colour is green. If there are at least two elements coloured red, then there is a red 2-term arithmetic progression.
Suppose that there is only one element \(i\in [1,18]\) coloured red. If \(i\in [1,9]\) then \([i+1,18]\) contains at least nine consecutive integers coloured blue or green. Since \(w(3,3)=9\) there is monochromatic 3-term arithmetic progression contained in \([i+1,18]\text{.}\) If \(i\in [10,18]\) then \([1,i-1]\) contains at least nine consecutive integers coloured blue or green. Since \(w(3,3)=9\) there is monochromatic 3-term arithmetic progression contained in \([1,i-1]\text{.}\)
If there is no element coloured red, then the interval \([1,18]\) is 2-coloured. Since \(w(3,3)=9\) there is monochromatic 3-term arithmetic progression contained in \([1,18]\text{.}\)
Therefore any 3-colouring of \([1,18]\) contains a 2-term arithmetic progression in the first colour or a 3-term arithmetic progression in the second or third colour.
In 1974 Tom Brown proved that \(w(3;2,3,3)=14\text{.}\)
Exercise 3.6.4.
Szemerédi's theorem claims that any set of integers with positive upper density contains an arithmetic progression of any length.
Let \(A=\{ a_i:i\in \mathbb{N}\}\) be a set such that
-
Show that for any even \(n\in \mathbb{N}\)
\begin{equation*} \frac{|A\cap [1,n]|}{n}\geq\frac{1}{2}\text{.} \end{equation*} Conclude that the upper density of \(A\) is at least \(1/2\text{.}\)
Use Szemerédi's theorem to conclude that \(A\) contains arithmetic progressions of any finite length.
-
Note that
\begin{equation*} 0\lt a_{i+1}-a_i\leq 2, \mbox{ for all } i\in \mathbb{N} \end{equation*}implies that for \(a_i\) and \(a_{i+1}\) one of the following must be true:
\(a_{i+1}-a_i=1\) which means that \(a_i\) and \(a_{i+1}\) are consecutive integers
\(a_{i+1}-a_i=2\) which means that \(a_i\) and \(a_{i+1}\) are consecutive even integers or consecutive odd integers.
Therefore, for any \(k\in \mathbb{N}\)
\begin{equation*} A\cap \{2k-1,2k\}\not= \emptyset\text{.} \end{equation*}Hence for a chosen even integer \(n\text{,}\) the set \(A\) intersects each of \(n/2\) sets
\begin{equation*} \{ 1,2\}, \{3,4\},\ldots, \{2n-1,n\} \end{equation*}which implies that
\begin{equation*} |A\cap [1,n]|\geq \frac{n}{2}\text{.} \end{equation*}Therefore for any even \(n\in \mathbb{N}\)
\begin{equation*} \frac{|A\cap [1,n]|}{n}\geq\frac{1}{2}\text{.} \end{equation*} -
From (a) it follows that there is an infinite sequence \(\{x_i=\frac{|A\cap [1,2i]|}{2i}\}_{i\in \mathbb{N}}\) such that
\begin{equation*} \frac{1}{2}\leq x_i\leq 1 \text{ for all } i\in \mathbb{N}\text{.} \end{equation*}The limit of any convergent subsequence of this sequence is greater than \(\frac{1}{2}\) and hence
\begin{equation*} \overline{d}(A)=\limsup \frac{|A\cap [1,n]|}{n}\geq\frac{1}{2}\text{.} \end{equation*}Therefore the upper density of \(A\) is at least \(1/2\text{.}\)
Since the upper density of the set \(A\) is positive, by Szemerédi's theorem the set \(A\) contains arithmetic progressions of any finite length.
Exercise 3.6.5.
Show that the set
does not contain any 3-term arithmetic progressions.
Suppose that \(i,j,k\in \mathbb{N}\text{,}\) \(i\lt j\lt k\text{,}\) are such that \(2^i\text{,}\) \(2^j\text{,}\) \(2^k\) form a 3-term arithmetic progression. This means that
It follows that
and
But this is impossible since \(2^{j-i}-1\) is an odd integer and \(2^{j-1}(2^{k-j}-1)\) is an even integer.
Therefore he set
does not contain any 3-term arithmetic progressions.
Exercise 3.6.6.
Give an example of:
An infinite colouring of positive integers that does not contain a monochromatic 2-term arithmetic progression.
A 3-colouring that avoids 2-term arithmetic progressions with a common difference that is equal 1 (mod 3).
Colour every integer differently.
-
Consider the colouring
\begin{equation*} c(i)=\left\{ \begin{array}{lcl} \mbox{red} \amp \text{ if } \amp i\equiv 0\pmod 3\\ \mbox{blue} \amp \text{ if } \amp i\equiv 1\pmod 3\\ \mbox{green} \amp \text{ if } \amp i\equiv 2\pmod 3. \end{array} \right. \end{equation*}It follows that if \(a\) and \(b\) are of the same colour then \(a\equiv b\pmod 3\text{.}\) Therefore the colouring \(c\) avoids 2-term arithmetic progressions with a common difference that is equal 1 (mod 3).